Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
S D Prajwal Dev vs Eliakim Coulibaly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dev vs Coulibaly analysis and find out who is favored!
S D Prajwal Dev vs Eliakim Coulibaly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dev 0 - 0 Coulibaly
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dev has won 43.87% of points on his second serve, while Coulibaly has won 48.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dev, in recent form, has won 55.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coulibaly has won 53.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.01% and 37.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dev has saved 54.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coulibaly has saved 64.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dev has won 55.17% of matches played (W/L 32/ 26), with Coulibaly winning 60% (W/L 39/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 43/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Coulibaly has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 111/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Dev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 30/ 21), where as Coulibaly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.38% of matches (W/L 34/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dev has played against opponents with an average rank of 81.41 while Coulibaly has played against players with an average rank of 126.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dev has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coulibaly has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dev has converted 43.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coulibaly has converted 45.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
674
Rank
595
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
573
Rank
378
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
49% (141-145)
Career Total W/L
66% (132-67)
38% (6-10)
YTD W/L
65% (22-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | S D Prajwal Dev | Eliakim Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 65% (22/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 65% (44/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (148/164) | 58% (357/263) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 63% (12/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.53 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 160 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 119 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:53 | 1:26:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 109.5 | 57.68 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (568/992) | 65% (1214/1855) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (369/568) | 73% (889/1214) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (186/424) | 48% (308/641) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (53/122) | 46% (103/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (437/1025) | 43% (841/1958) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (4/6) | 67% (20/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (5/14) | 67% (22/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 100% (22/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (22/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (12/0) |
S D Prajwal Dev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Luca Fantini
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
21
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
76 of
122)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Kazuma Kawachi
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Parth Aggarwal
39%
(
22 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicola Rispoli
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Damir Zhalgasbay
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuvan Nandal
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dhruv Hirpara
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Eliakim Coulibaly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
6
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
85%
(
47 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Kazuma Kawachi
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Abdella Nedim Mohammed
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Dev Javia
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Pablo Trochu
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Dev Vs Coulibaly Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
